Topic 3: RUPEE

The Indian rupee weakened sharply against the US dollar in December 2025, extending a year-long depreciation trend and emerging as Asia’s worst-performing major currency, though without signs of a balance-of-payments crisis. The month began with the rupee trading around ₹89.6–89.7 per dollar but quickly slipped under persistent pressure, breaching ₹90 in the first week, touching record lows near ₹90.49 by December 11, and briefly crossing ₹91 in mid-December before stabilising toward the end of the month in the ₹90.8–90.9 range. Overall, the rupee declined by about 2% during December alone and more than 5% on a year-to-date basis, significantly underperforming several Asian peers despite a broadly stable global dollar index. This sharp move reflected a convergence of domestic imbalances and external shocks rather than a single trigger.
A major driver was sustained foreign portfolio investor outflows, with FPIs selling over $1.6 billion of Indian equities and debt during December and cumulative equity outflows exceeding ₹1.48 lakh crore for the year, as investors rotated toward safer dollar assets amid global uncertainty, elevated US yields and concerns over Indian asset valuations. These flows translated directly into higher dollar demand as funds were repatriated, intensifying pressure on both spot and forward currency markets. Trade-related concerns compounded the problem, as stalled US–India trade negotiations and aggressive tariff hikes by the US—reportedly up to 50% on key Indian exports such as textiles, pharmaceuticals and electronics—eroded confidence in India’s external earnings outlook and threatened export competitiveness. These fears came on top of a widening trade deficit, with weak global demand dragging exports lower while imports surged due to higher purchases of gold, crude oil and capital goods, forcing corporates and refiners to front-load dollar buying. Currency market dynamics were further amplified by heavy importer hedging and stress in the offshore non-deliverable forward (NDF) market, which pushed up forward premia and magnified each bout of risk aversion.
Against this backdrop, the Reserve Bank of India adopted a consciously measured approach, intervening selectively to smooth volatility rather than defending any specific level. While the RBI reportedly sold dollars intermittently—drawing down reserves but keeping them at comfortable levels—it allowed the rupee to act as a “shock absorber,” consistent with its growth-supportive stance following a 25-basis-point rate cut and the IMF’s classification of India’s regime as a managed, crawl-like arrangement. This policy tolerance of gradual depreciation helped prevent panic but also meant that external pressures were reflected more fully in the exchange rate.
Market reactions to the weaker rupee were contained rather than disorderly: bond yields firmed slightly as currency risk and current-account concerns lifted term premia, equities faced intermittent foreign selling even as domestic investors provided support, and the real economy confronted near-term headwinds from imported inflation and costlier foreign borrowing. At the same time, some analysts noted that a weaker rupee could partially offset tariff damage by improving export price competitiveness over time. By late December, the breach of the psychologically important ₹90 level was widely interpreted not as a crisis signal but as a policy-tolerated reset driven by trade shocks, capital outflows and global risk aversion, leaving the rupee stabilised but vulnerable heading into 2026 until clarity emerges on tariffs, portfolio flows and global monetary conditions



The information contained herein (the “Information”) may not be reproduced or disseminated in whole or in part without prior written permission from the Company. The information herein is meant only for general reading purposes and the views being expressed only constitute opinions and therefore cannot be considered as guidelines, recommendations or as a professional guide for the readers. The document has been prepared based on publicly available information, internally developed data and other sources believed to be reliable. The directors, employees, affiliates or representatives (“Entities & their affiliates”) do not assume any responsibility for, or warrant the accuracy, completeness, adequacy, reliability and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Readers are advised to rely on their own analysis, interpretations & investigations. Certain statements made in this presentation may not be based on historical information or facts and may be forward looking statements including those relating to general business plans and strategy, future financial condition and growth prospects, and future developments in industries and competitive and regulatory environments. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are reasonable, they do involve several assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Readers are also advised to seek independent professional advice to arrive at an informed investment decision. Entities & their affiliates including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this document shall not be liable in any way for direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages, including on account of the lost profits arising from the information contained in this material. Readers alone shall be fully responsible for any decision taken based on this document.
Copyright © 2022 Fintso